sabotlours: (Default)
[personal profile] sabotlours
Last night Kitty and I went to see "Brokeback Mountain." I would have waited for it to come out on DVD, but I feel it is important to send a message to Hollywood that there are people interested in alternative theater and that they don't have to keep sending us the same old shit in order to make money. I think that message will come through loud and clear with this movie since the theater was almost sold out and the showing after ours WAS sold out. It sucked major balls that we were stuck in the 4th row, but those were just about the only seats left.

Now I have read a few reviews on my friends' pages that have ranged from "best movie of the century!" to "OMG! That sucked!" I will be somewhere in between, but definitely more towards the "it was a very good movie."

I definitely think that Heath Ledger will get a nomination for Best Actor for his role. I also think that Michelle Williams will get a nomination for her role as Ennis' wife. The scenery was gorgeous and made me miss Wyoming. I spent a Summer there in '86 for geology field camp.

There were a lot of plot points that hit home and many that missed. Having worked a few Summers in a small farming and ranching community in eastern Oregon, I could also identify with the sense of isolation of being different in a small town. I can appreciate the plight of my 2 dear lesbian friends that lived 100 miles apart in redneck country. I could also identify with the trials and tribulations of an LDR as seen so often with my friends on LJ. I know what it's like to "go through the motions" to make the world think you're normal. I know there are several people on my friends list who went through sham marriages while keeping their gay side firmly in the closet until they couldn't stand it any longer. So in that sense I know that the movie portrayed events that can and do happen in every day life to many of us.

I had a real problem with the development of the love story between the 2. It seemed too Hollywood that 2 people meet and the next minute are having sex. There was no buildup to the relationship. Just because 2 men live together alone in the woods for a few months means they're going to get gay with each other. Did they both have gaydar and know that the other wanted each other? There was nothing to suggest that either of them wanted each other. Perhaps I missed something. I just thought it was too rushed without any sign that there was a love developing. And the brief sex scene was ruined for me by a bunch of giggling teenagers in back of me. That didn't help.

Where I think the movie hit on a great theme was the fact that not only were the men affected by their LDR but their wives were also caught up and their lives shattered by the love affair. Overall I thought it was a terrific drama. I'm not sure if it would be worthy of Best Picture, but it will definitely be nominated.

Date: 2005-12-31 04:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] siegewolf.livejournal.com
I agree, very powerful drama. I tend to disagree on the development point though. There are several glances exchanged, albeit very subtle and brief. About as long as a closeted gay man in 1960's Wyoming would dare to look.
It's nice for once to be able to banter with ya about a flick. [livejournal.com profile] theome and I went to see the film Tuesday. :)

Date: 2005-12-31 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sabotlours.livejournal.com
I just think there needed to be another moment after Ennis spent the night out in the cold. They could have snuggled for warmth one night and then had the freak nasty homo butt sex the next. How about a little foreplay before the sex? Oh right. They're men ;oP
(deleted comment)

Date: 2005-12-31 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sabotlours.livejournal.com
I probably need to see it again since being that close to the screen probably made me miss a lot. I'll wait for it to come out on DVD. I still say the buildup was a little rushed and typical "Hollywood" style that people fall instantly in love. That would be especially true of a gay romance in Wyoming in the '60's. I would expect them to be a little more cautious.

Date: 2005-12-31 07:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] linnaeus.livejournal.com
Yeah, it kind of strained credulity for me that things would jump so quickly from hand-happening-to-land-on-his-genitals to unlubricated-cowboy-butsecks. I mean give me something I can use! :) And personally, if it was that cold outside, it wouldn't have been much warmer in the tent

Still, it was a very well done film, if a little slowly paced at times. Michelle Williams did a great job, and as a friend of mine said, any time there's a movie with two male leads and Heath Ledger is the less pretty one, you're in for some serious eye candy. :)

Date: 2006-01-01 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baloo-ursidae.livejournal.com
Yeah, it kind of strained credulity for me that things would jump so quickly from hand-happening-to-land-on-his-genitals to unlubricated-cowboy-butsecks. I mean give me something I can use! :) And personally, if it was that cold outside, it wouldn't have been much warmer in the tent


Not having seen the movie, but having spent 125+ nights camping with my Scout troop, I can safely say it's damn near impossible to get a tent or snowcave interior to dip below 32 when occupied. Snowcaves especially stay right around the freezing point. Which is actually comfortable and warm if it's 10 degrees and windy outside.

(deleted comment)

Date: 2006-01-01 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baloo-ursidae.livejournal.com
I love your optimism, but nothing that doesn't have a box office draw of three times Bill Gates income ever wins awards.

Date: 2005-12-31 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] artfulreggie.livejournal.com
This one time, at geology field camp.... ;)

Date: 2006-01-01 12:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sabotlours.livejournal.com
Evil fox! *thwap*

Gay cowboys eating pudding

Date: 2006-01-01 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That's a South Park description of independent films that stuck with me. When I saw the trailers for that film, I thought, "OMG, that really IS gay cowboys eating pudding." I thought the trailers were so trite that I didn't even plan to see it, despite my sympathy with the theme. I wasn't really interested in an overwrought, trite story about homosexuality or any other kind of sexuality. But, your review makes it sound like it has a lot of depth, if flaws, so I'll probably trek out and watch it if I get the chance.

Re: Gay cowboys eating pudding

Date: 2006-01-01 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] echoweaver.livejournal.com
!@#$! I really need to check better for when I've been logged out.

Date: 2006-01-01 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] colifox.livejournal.com
I am dying to see this movie - its out over here now, so will have to go, but your review makes me wanna go even sooner now :P

Date: 2006-01-01 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowcub67.livejournal.com
Saw your review and checked, but it doesn't appear to be playing in Pittsburgh, PA, yet/any more. :(

Profile

sabotlours: (Default)
sabotlours

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 78910 1112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 05:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios